Before attempting this problem, you should be comfortable with:
Two strings belong to the same shifting sequence if the relative differences between consecutive characters are identical. For example, "abc" and "xyz" both have differences of +1 between each pair of adjacent letters. By computing these differences for each string and using them as a hash key, we can group all strings that share the same shifting pattern together.
The key insight is that we normalize differences using modulo 26 to handle wrap-around cases (like 'z' shifting to 'a'). This way, strings that can be shifted into one another will produce the same hash key.
26 to handle wrap-around.class Solution:
def groupStrings(self, strings: List[str]) -> List[List[str]]:
def get_hash(string: str):
key = []
for a, b in zip(string, string[1:]):
key.append(chr((ord(b) - ord(a)) % 26 + ord('a')))
return ''.join(key)
# Create a hash value (hash_key) for each string and append the string
# to the list of hash values i.e. mapHashToList["cd"] = ["acf", "gil", "xzc"]
groups = collections.defaultdict(list)
for string in strings:
hash_key = get_hash(string)
groups[hash_key].append(string)
# Return a list of all of the grouped strings
return list(groups.values())Where is the length of
stringsand is the maximum length of a string instrings.
When computing the difference between consecutive characters, s[i] - s[i-1] can be negative (e.g., going from 'z' to 'a'). Simply using modulo is not enough in some languages; you must add 26 before taking modulo to ensure a positive result: (s[i] - s[i-1] + 26) % 26. Failing to do this produces different hash keys for strings that should be grouped together.
Single-character strings have no consecutive character pairs, producing an empty hash key. All single-character strings should be grouped together since any single character can shift to any other. Ensure your hash function handles this case correctly by returning a consistent empty or default key.
The shifting sequence is directional: "az" and "za" have different patterns. Using abs(s[i] - s[i-1]) would incorrectly group these together. The correct approach uses (s[i] - s[i-1] + 26) % 26 to preserve the direction of the shift while handling wrap-around.