1968. Array With Elements Not Equal to Average of Neighbors - Explanation
Prerequisites
Before attempting this problem, you should be comfortable with:
- Sorting - Used to arrange elements so we can pick from smallest and largest ends
- Two Pointers - Needed to efficiently pick elements from both ends of the sorted array
- Greedy Algorithms - Understanding why interleaving small and large values guarantees a valid arrangement
1. Greedy
Intuition
If we sort the array, adjacent elements become close in value, which makes it more likely for an element to be the average of its neighbors. To avoid this, we can interleave elements from the small and large ends of the sorted array. By alternating between picking from the front (small) and back (large), we create a pattern where neighbors differ significantly, preventing any element from being the exact average of its neighbors.
Algorithm
- Sort the array in ascending order.
- Use two pointers: one at the beginning (
l) and one at the end (r) of the sorted array. - Build the result by alternating between taking from
l(small values) andr(large values). - Continue until all elements are placed.
- Return the result array.
Time & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity:
2. Greedy (Space Optimized)
Intuition
Instead of building a new array, we can rearrange in place. After sorting, if we swap every pair of adjacent elements at odd indices with their preceding element, we create a zigzag pattern. This ensures that each element at an odd index is a local maximum or minimum relative to its neighbors, which prevents any element from being the average of its neighbors.
Algorithm
- Sort the array in ascending order.
- Iterate through the array starting at index 1, stepping by 2.
- At each step, swap the element at index
iwith the element at indexi - 1. - This creates pairs where the larger element comes before the smaller one in each pair.
- Return the modified array.
Time & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity: or depending on the sorting algorithm.
3. Greedy (Optimal) - I
Intuition
We can fix violations as we find them without sorting first. If an element equals the average of its neighbors, swapping it with an adjacent element will break that relationship. By making one forward pass and one backward pass, we can fix all violations. The forward pass handles cases where swapping with the next element helps, and the backward pass catches any remaining issues.
Algorithm
- Make a forward pass from index
1ton-2.- If the current element equals the average of its neighbors, swap it with the next element.
- Make a backward pass from index
n-2to1.- If the current element equals the average of its neighbors, swap it with the previous element.
- Return the modified array.
class Solution:
def rearrangeArray(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
n = len(nums)
for i in range(1, n - 1):
if 2 * nums[i] == (nums[i - 1] + nums[i + 1]):
nums[i], nums[i + 1] = nums[i + 1], nums[i]
for i in range(n - 2, 0, -1):
if 2 * nums[i] == (nums[i - 1] + nums[i + 1]):
nums[i], nums[i - 1] = nums[i - 1], nums[i]
return numsTime & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity: extra space.
4. Greedy Optimal - II
Intuition
A valid arrangement alternates between increasing and decreasing. We can enforce this pattern in a single pass by tracking whether the next step should increase or decrease. Starting from the relationship between the first two elements, we alternate the expected direction. If the actual relationship violates the expected direction, we swap to fix it.
Algorithm
- Determine the initial direction based on whether
nums[0] < nums[1](increasing) or not. - Iterate from index
1ton-2. - If the direction is increasing and
nums[i] < nums[i+1], or if decreasing andnums[i] > nums[i+1], swapnums[i]andnums[i+1]. - Toggle the direction after each step.
- Return the modified array.
class Solution:
def rearrangeArray(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
increase = nums[0] < nums[1]
for i in range(1, len(nums) - 1):
if ((increase and nums[i] < nums[i + 1]) or
(not increase and nums[i] > nums[i + 1])
):
nums[i], nums[i + 1] = nums[i + 1], nums[i]
increase = not increase
return numsTime & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity: extra space.
Common Pitfalls
Checking Only One Direction After Swapping
When fixing a violation by swapping, the swap might create a new violation at the previous position. A single forward pass may not catch all cases, which is why some solutions use both forward and backward passes.
# Wrong: only forward pass may leave violations
for i in range(1, n - 1):
if 2 * nums[i] == nums[i-1] + nums[i+1]:
nums[i], nums[i+1] = nums[i+1], nums[i]
# A backward pass is also neededUsing Division for Average Check
Using division to check if an element equals the average of its neighbors can introduce floating-point precision issues. Instead, multiply both sides by 2 to avoid division entirely.
# Wrong: floating-point comparison
if nums[i] == (nums[i-1] + nums[i+1]) / 2:
# Correct: integer comparison
if 2 * nums[i] == nums[i-1] + nums[i+1]:Forgetting to Handle Array Boundaries
The check only applies to elements with both neighbors (indices 1 through n-2). Applying the average check to the first or last element causes index out of bounds errors.
# Wrong: starts at index 0
for i in range(len(nums) - 1):
if 2 * nums[i] == nums[i-1] + nums[i+1]: # i=0 causes nums[-1] access