1553. Minimum Number of Days to Eat N Oranges - Explanation
Description
You have n oranges. Each day you must choose exactly one of the following actions:
- Eat one orange.
- If the current number of oranges is divisible by
2, eat half of them. - If the current number is divisible by
3, eat two thirds of them.
Return the fewest days needed to eat every orange.
Example 1:
Input: n = 3
Output: 2Explanation: Eat two oranges on the first day using the divisible-by-3 action, then eat the last orange on the second day.
Example 2:
Input: n = 4
Output: 3Explanation: Eat half to leave two oranges, then one orange on each of the next two days. Three days are necessary.
Example 3:
Input: n = 1
Output: 1Explanation: Eat the only orange in one day.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 2000000000
Topics
Prerequisites
Before attempting this problem, you should be comfortable with:
- Dynamic Programming (Memoization) - Caching recursive results to avoid redundant computation
- Recursion - Breaking down problems into smaller subproblems with base cases
- BFS (Breadth-First Search) - Finding shortest paths in unweighted graphs by exploring level by level
- Greedy Algorithms - Making locally optimal choices to reach a global optimum
1. Dynamic Programming (Top-Down)
Intuition
At each step, we can eat one orange, half the oranges (if divisible by 2), or two-thirds of the oranges (if divisible by 3). A naive recursion explores all three options at each state and picks the minimum.
The challenge is that n can be very large, but memoization helps by caching results for previously computed values. However, this approach still explores too many states because eating one orange at a time creates many intermediate values.
Algorithm
- Use a hash map to memoize results for each value of
n. - Base case: if
nis0, return0(no days needed). - For each state, compute the minimum of:
- Eating one orange and solving for
n - 1 - If divisible by
2, eating half and solving forn / 2 - If divisible by
3, eating two-thirds and solving forn / 3
- Eating one orange and solving for
- Store and return the minimum result plus one day.
class Solution:
def minDays(self, n: int) -> int:
dp = {}
def dfs(n):
if n == 0:
return 0
if n in dp:
return dp[n]
res = 1 + dfs(n - 1)
if n % 3 == 0:
res = min(res, 1 + dfs(n // 3))
if n % 2 == 0:
res = min(res, 1 + dfs(n // 2))
dp[n] = res
return res
return dfs(n)Time & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity:
2. Greedy + Dynamic Programming (Top-Down)
Intuition
The key optimization is recognizing that we should always try to divide rather than subtract one repeatedly. Instead of exploring n - 1 recursively (which creates exponentially many states), we can directly compute how many subtractions are needed to reach a divisible number.
To reach a number divisible by 2, we need n % 2 subtractions. To reach a number divisible by 3, we need n % 3 subtractions. By adding these remainder costs upfront, we only need to recurse on n / 2 and n / 3, drastically reducing the state space to O(log n).
Algorithm
- Use a hash map with base cases:
0oranges takes0days,1orange takes1day. - For each state
n:- Compute cost to divide by
2:(n % 2)remainder days +1division day + solve forn / 2 - Compute cost to divide by
3:(n % 3)remainder days +1division day + solve forn / 3 - Take the minimum of both options.
- Compute cost to divide by
- Memoize and return the result.
Time & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity:
3. Breadth First Search
Intuition
BFS naturally finds the shortest path in an unweighted graph. Here, each state (number of oranges) is a node, and each valid operation is an edge. Since all edges have equal cost (one day), BFS will find the minimum days when we first reach 0.
We use a visited set to avoid reprocessing the same orange count. From each state, we explore eating one orange, and optionally dividing by 2 or 3 if applicable.
Algorithm
- Initialize a queue with
nand a visited set. - Process level by level (each level represents one day):
- For each current orange count, try all three operations.
- If any operation results in
0, return the current day count. - Add unvisited new states to the queue.
- Continue until reaching
0.
class Solution:
def minDays(self, n: int) -> int:
q = deque([n])
visit = set()
res = 0
while q:
res += 1
for _ in range(len(q)):
node = q.popleft()
nei = node - 1
if nei == 0:
return res
if nei not in visit:
visit.add(nei)
q.append(nei)
for d in range(2, 4):
if node % d == 0:
nei = node // d
if nei == 0:
return res
if nei not in visit:
visit.add(nei)
q.append(nei)
return resTime & Space Complexity
- Time complexity:
- Space complexity:
Common Pitfalls
Recursing on n-1 Directly Causes TLE
The naive approach of recursively calling dfs(n-1) for the "eat one orange" option explores O(n) states, causing Time Limit Exceeded for large inputs. The key optimization is to never recurse on n-1 directly. Instead, compute the cost to reach the nearest divisible number: (n % 2) + 1 + dfs(n // 2) or (n % 3) + 1 + dfs(n // 3). This reduces the state space from O(n) to O(log n).
Missing Base Cases in Memoization
The optimized solution requires explicit base cases for n = 0 and n = 1 before computing the recursive formula. Forgetting dp[1] = 1 will cause infinite recursion or incorrect results since the formula 1 + (n % 2) + dfs(n // 2) does not naturally terminate at 1. Always initialize the memoization cache with {0: 0, 1: 1}.
Integer Division Confusion Across Languages
In the optimized recurrence, you compute dfs(n // 2) and dfs(n // 3). Be careful with integer division semantics. In Python, // performs floor division. In JavaScript, you need Math.floor(n / 2). Using regular division / in languages like JavaScript or Python 2 will produce floating-point results, causing cache misses and incorrect behavior.
Forgetting That All Three Options Must Be Considered
Even in the optimized solution, you must consider both paths: reducing to a multiple of 2 and reducing to a multiple of 3. Some solutions incorrectly assume one division is always better. For example, with n = 7, going via 6 (divide by 3) takes 3 days, but going via 6 then 3 then 1 needs careful comparison. Always take the minimum of both division paths.
Sign in to join the discussion